ANALYSIS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS BEHIND MORAL RATIONALIZATION: A THEORETICAL EXPLORATION
Keywords:
Moral rationalization, cognitive dissonance, self-justification, moral disengagement, motivated reasoning, cultural influences, moral developmentAbstract
Moral rationalization is a cognitive process where individuals justify their unethical behavior to align it with their moral beliefs, thus reducing cognitive dissonance. This paper explores the psychological mechanisms underlying moral rationalization, focusing on cognitive biases, heuristics, self-deception, and motivated reasoning. By integrating theoretical perspectives from cognitive dissonance theory, self-justification, and moral disengagement, the paper examines how societal and cultural influences shape moral rationalization. Furthermore, it discusses the implications for moral development and ethical behavior, highlighting the importance of educational and psychological interventions. The exploration provides a foundation for future research and theoretical advancements in understanding moral rationalization.
References
• Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. Worth Publishers.
• Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2018). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 282-316). John Wiley & Sons.
• Festinger, L. (2010). Cognitive dissonance theory: An overview. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-34). Academic Press.
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage Books.
• Kunda, Z. (2013). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498.
• Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2013). Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33, 53-77.
• Paharia, N., Kassam, K. S., Greene, J. D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2013). Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 134-141.
• Pizarro, D. A., & Salovey, P. (2012). Being and becoming a good person: The role of emotional intelligence in moral development. In J. Haidt & C. Joseph (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 139-158). American Psychological Association.
• Prentice, R., & Zhen, H. (2017). Ethical blindness: When good people do bad things without being aware of it. Organizational Dynamics, 46(4), 252-258.
• Reynolds, S. J. (2015). Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 940-955.
• Shu, L. L., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2011). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 24(3), 85-106.
• Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2010). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 24(3), 85-106.
• Tsang, J. A. (2017). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 54-70.
• Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2012). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), 479-491.
• Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476-480.
• Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2011). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451-1452.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Universal Research Reports
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.