Assessment Methods: Traditional Exams vs. Continuous Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36676/urr.v11.i5.1447Keywords:
student performance, educational process, student knowledge, comprehensive, evaluation, improvementAbstract
Assessment methods play a crucial role in the educational process, providing a means to evaluate student learning, progress, and performance. This research paper explores the differences between traditional exams and continuous assessment, highlighting their respective advantages and disadvantages. Focusing on the Indian education system, the paper discusses the impact of these assessment methods on student learning outcomes and overall educational quality. The study also examines the current trends and challenges in assessment practices in India and proposes recommendations for a balanced approach to student evaluation.
References
Banerjee, R. (2017). Challenges of Continuous Assessment in Indian Schools. Journal of Educational Studies, 23(4), 112-129.
Das, A. (2019). Reducing Stress in Students through Continuous Assessment. Indian Journal of Psychological Science, 9(2), 77-89.
Ghosh, S. (2016). Formative Assessment in Indian Classrooms: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 42(3), 55-70.
Kumar, R. (2019). Teacher Training for Effective Assessment Practices. Journal of Teacher Education and Research, 14(1), 45-60.
MHRD. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. Retrieved from MHRD India
NCERT. (2014). Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation: A Teacher's Handbook. National Council of Educational Research and Training, Government of India.
Rao, S. (2015). Ensuring Fairness in Continuous Assessment: Challenges and Strategies. Indian Educational Review, 52(2), 34-50.
Sharma, N. (2020). Traditional Exams vs. Continuous Assessment: Impact on Student Learning. Asian Journal of Education and Development, 16(1), 25-40.
Singh, P. (2018). Exam Stress and its Impact on Student Performance. Indian Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 13(3), 97-109.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Universal Research Reports
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.