COMPARETIVE STUDY OF MBR AND CAS WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
Keywords:
Water treatment, membrane technologyAbstract
This Paper deals with comparison of membrane bioreactors with conventional activated sludge systems for wastewater treatment. There are many water shortage problems currently in India, some of which are more serious public concern over health and the environment combined with the increased requirements for municipalities to reuse wastewater, have created a need for new technologies that can treat wastewater to generate high quality reusable water at low cost. In several of these technologies, membrane technology could make a great contribution since membrane have the ability to produce water of exceptional purity that can be recycled for reuse in a variety of places. In this papers, several aspects of MBR are covered, with an exhaustive over view of its biological performance different configurations and hydraulics of MBR are prevented, with attention given to fouling phenomena and strategies for reducing it.
References
M A Karim “A Preliminary Comparative Analysis of MBR and CAS Wastewater Treatment Systems” International Journal of Water and Wastewater Treatment ISSN 2381-5299
AlejandroGonzalez-Martinez “Comparison of bacterial communities of conventional and A-stage activated sludge systems” Scientific Reports | 6:18786 | DOI: 10.1038/srep18786
Benny M. B. Ensano “Combination of Electrochemical Processes with Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment and Fouling Control: A Review” Front. Environ. Sci., 31 August 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00057
Gonzalez-Martinez, A. et al. Bacterial community structure of a lab-scale anammox membrane bioreactor. Biotechnol. Prog. 31, 186–193 (2015).
De Luca G, Sacchetti R, Leoni E, Zanetti F (2013) Removal of indicator bacteriophages from municipal wastewater by a full-scale membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge process: Implications to water reuse. Bioresour Technol 129: 526-531.
Zhang, F., Li, J., and He, Z. (2014). A new method for nutrients removal and recovery from wastewater using a bioelectrochemical system. Bioresour. Technol. 166, 630–634. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.105
Zhang, J., Satti, A., Chen, X., Xiao, K., Sun, J., Yan, X., et al. (2015). Low-voltage electric field applied into MBR for fouling suppression: performance and mechanisms. Chem. Eng. J. 273, 223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.044
Zhang, J., Xiao, K., Liang, P., Waite, T. D., and Huang, X. (2014). Electrically released iron for fouling control in membrane bioreactors: a double-edged sword? Desalination 347, 10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.018
Zhang, K., Wei, P., Yao, M., Field, R. W., and Cui, Z. (2011). Effect of the bubbling regimes on the performance and energy cost of flat sheet MBRs. Desalination 283, 221–226. doi: 1016/j.desal.2011.04.023
Zhou, L., Xia, S., and Alvarez-Cohen, L. (2015). Structure and distribution of inorganic components in the cake layer of a membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 196, 586–591. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.026
