Good governance, working definitions and components
Keywords:
democracy, development policyAbstract
Almost all major development institutions today say that promoting good governance is an important part of their agendas. Despite this consensus, ‘good governance’ is an extremely elusive objective: it means different things to different organizations and to different actors within these organizations. This study provides a review of donor approaches and discusses good governance as a concept. While methodological discussions are often esoteric, the study argues that this one has real world relevance to development policy because donor agencies regularly measure and assess the quality of governance, condition assistance on these measurements, seek to design evidence-based policies, and justify their focus on good governance partly on the basis of claims that better governance promotes economic development. The weakness of the good governance concept calls into question each of these projects.
References
Abrahamsen, R. (2000). Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance in Africa. London: Zed Books.
Adcock, R., and D. Collier (2001). ‘Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research’. American Political Science Review, 95(3): 529-46.
Asian Development Bank (1995). Governance: Sound Economic Management. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Biersteker, T.J. (2010). ‘Global Governance’. In M.D. Cavelty and V. Mauer (eds), Routledge Handbook of Security Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 439-51.
Collier, D., and S. Levitsky (1997). ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research’. World Politics, 49(3): 430-51.
Doorenspleet, R. (2004). ‘The Structural Context of Recent Transitions to Democracy’. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3): 309-35.
Gerring, J. (2001). Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
