ROLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Keywords:
explanations behind, NATURAL JUSTICEAbstract
Normal equity is a term of craftsmanship that indicates explicit procedural rights in the English lawful framework and the frameworks of different countries dependent on it. It is like the American ideas of reasonable methodology and procedural fair treatment, the last having roots that somewhat parallel the starting points of common equity. Albeit regular equity has an amazing family line and is said to express the cozy connection between the customary law and good standards, the utilization of the term today isn't to be mistaken for the "characteristic law" of the Canonists, the medieval thinkers' dreams of a "perfect example of society" or the "normal rights" reasoning of the eighteenth century. While the term common equity is regularly held as a general idea, in purviews, for example, Australia, and the United Kingdom, it has to a great extent been supplanted and stretched out by the more broad "obligation to act reasonably". Common equity is related to the two constituents of a reasonable hearing, which are the standard against predisposition (nemo iudex in causa sua, or "no man a judge in his own motivation"), and the privilege to a reasonable hearing (audi alteram partem, or "hear the opposite side").
References
Jump up to:a b c d Lord Woolf; Jeffrey Jowell; Andrew Le Sueur, eds. (2007), "Procedural Fairness: Introduction, History and Comparative Perspectives", De Smith's Judicial Review (6th ed.), London: Sweet & Maxwell, pp. 317–354 at 321, ISBN 978-0-421-69030-1.
J.R.S. Forbes (2006), "Natural Justice: General", Justice in Tribunals (2nd ed.), Sydney: The Federation Press, pp. 100–118 at 103, ISBN 978-1-86287-610-1.
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/administrative-law-643-1.html
http://www.lawnotes.in/Principles_of_Natural_Justice
http://www.lawvedic.com/article/principles-of-natural-justice-in-indian-constitution-177
