Microcrystalline cellulose, a direct compression binder in a quality by design environment—A review

Authors

  • Kumar V

Keywords:

Direct Compression, Microcrystalline Cellulose

Abstract

The ICH quality vision introduced the concept of quality by design (QbD), which requires a greater understanding of the raw material attributes, of process parameters, of their variability and their interactions. Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) is one of the most important tableting excipients thanks to its outstanding dry binding properties, enabling the manufacture of tablets by direct compression (DC). DC remains the most economical technique to produce large batches of tablets, however its efficacy is directly impacted by the raw material attributes. Therefore excipients’ variability and their impact on drug product performance need to be thoroughly understood. To help with this process, this review article gathers prior knowledge on MCC, focuses on its use in DC and lists some of its potential critical material attributes (CMAs).

References

Moreton, C., 2009c. Functionality and performance of excipients in a quality-by- design world, part 4: obtaining information on excipient variability for formulation design space. Am. Pharm. Rev. 12, 28–33.

Moreton, C., 2010. Functionality and performance of excipients in a quality-by- design world, part VIII: excipient specifications. Am. Pharm. Rev. 13, 46–50.

Mostafa, H.F., Ibrahim, M.A., Sakr, A., 2013. Development and optimization of dextromethorphan hydrobromide oral disintegrating tablets: effect of formu- lation and process variables. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 18, 454–463.

Narang, A.S., Rao, V.M., Guo, H., Lu, J., Desai, D.S., 2010. Effect of force feeder on tablet strength during compression. Int. J. Pharm. 401, 7–15.

Narayan, P., Hancock, B.C., 2005. The influence of particlesize on the surface roughness of pharmaceutical excipient compacts. Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 407, 226–233.

Nokhodchi, A., 2005. An overview of the effect of moisture on compaction and compression. Pharm. Technol. 46–66.

Nyström, C., Alderborn, G., Duberg, M., Karehill, P.-G., 1993. Bonding surface area and bonding mechanism – two important factors for the understanding of powder compactability. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 19, 2143–2196.

Obae, K., Iijima, H., Imada, K., 1999. Morphological effect of microcrystalline cellulose particles on tablet tensile strength. Int. J. Pharm. 182, 155–164.

Otsuka, M., Yamane, I., Matsuda, Y., 2004. Effects of lubricant mixing on compression properties of various kinds of direct compression excipients and physical properties of the tablets. Adv. Powder Technol. 15, 477–493.

Patel, N.K., Upadhyay, A.H., Bergum, J.S., Reier, G.E., 1994. An evaluation of microcrystalline cellulose and lactose excipients using an instrumented single station tablet press. Int. J. Pharm. 110, 203–210.

Patel, S., Kaushal, A.M., Bansal, A.K., 2006. Compression physics in the formulation development of tablets. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 23, 1–65.

Peck, G.E., Anderson, N.R., Banker, G.S., 1990. Principles of improved tablet production system design. In: Liebermann, H.A., Liebermann, H.A., Lachman, L., Lachman, L., Schwartz, J.B., Schwartz, J.B. (Eds.), Pharmaceutical Dosage Froms: Tablets. Lea & Febiger, pp. 1–76.

Pesonen, T., Paronen, P., 1990. The effect of particle and powder properties on the mechanical properties of directly compressed cellulose tablets. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 16, 31–54.

Ph.Eur. 8.0, 2014. Microcrystalline Cellulose. European Pharmacopoeia, pp.1824–1828. Pifferi, G., Santoro, P., Pedrani, M., 1999. Quality and functionality of excipients.

Podczeck, F., 2012. Methods for the practical determination of the mechanical strength of tablets—from empiricism to science. Int. J. Pharm. 436, 214–232.

Pönni, R., Vuorinen, T., Kontturi, E., 2012. Proposed nano-scale coalescence of cellulose in chemical pulp fibers during technical treatments. BioResources 7, 6077–6108.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-30

How to Cite

Kumar, V. (2018). Microcrystalline cellulose, a direct compression binder in a quality by design environment—A review. Universal Research Reports, 5(3), 346–356. Retrieved from https://urr.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/697

Issue

Section

Original Research Article