ENHANCED IMAGE COMPRESSION MECHANISM TO INCREASE EFFICIENCY OF BIOMETRICS
Keywords:
Biometrics, Image processingAbstract
Biometrics has been considered as machinery. It categorizes the different kind of human being. It has been done to measure and analyze one or more unique behavior. The uniquely categorization may be made by measuring the physical traits. Proposed mechanism has been determined best as compare to present biometrics application. The Image compression is a sort of data compression. It is utilized with digital graphics, in order to reduce the cost for storage. The present work is providing the review of several image compression mechanisms. The discussed techniques are Loosy Image Compression Methods and Lossless Image Compression Methods. In this paper the explanation of discussion is made on an algorithm based on compression of the graphics. This algorithm is capable to reduce the loss in quality of the graphics content in biometric system. This paper is providing the explanation of PSNR calculation at the time of image processing. PSNR calculation is capable to enlarge the efficiency of biometric. The proposed system is different, making comparison to existing biometrics application. The proposed work would introduce the security at registration level and at transaction time. It can be considered highly appropriate for image transmission at the time of networking.
References
MalwinderKaur(2015)A Literature Survey On Lossless Image Compression
Er. Kiran Bala, Varinderjit Kaur (2016), “Advance digital image compression using fast wavelet transforms comparative analysis with DWT”, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology Bala et al., 5(7): July, 2016
Anurag, Sonia Rani(2017) “JPEG Compression Using MATLAB” 2017 IJEDR | Volume 5, Issue 2
E. P. Kukula, M. J. Sutton, and S. J. Elliott, “The Human – Biometric-Sensor Interaction Evaluation Method : Biometric Performance and Usability Measurements,” pp. 1–8, 2010.
C. Rathgeb and A. Uhl, “Iris-Biometric Hash Generation for Biometric Database Indexing,” 2010.
S. C. Eastwood, V. P. Shmerko, S. N. Yanushkevich, and M. Drahansky, “Biometric Intelligence in Authentication Machines : From Talking Faces to Talking Robots,” 2014.
J. Galbally, S. Marcel, and J. Fierrez, “Image Quality Assessment for Fake Biometric Detection : Application to Iris , Fingerprint , and Face Recognition,” vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 710–724, 2014.
I. Sponsored, S. International, and C. On, “Enhancing Security for Multimodal Biometric using Hyper Image Encryption Algorithm,,” pp. 943–947, 2015.
R. Tolosana, R. Vera-rodriguez, J. Ortega-garcia, S. Member, and J. Fierrez, “Preprocessing and Feature Selection for Improved Sensor Interoperability in Online Biometric Signature Verification,” vol. 3, 2015. M. Bellaaj, R. Boukhris, A. Damak, and D. Sellami, “Possibilistic Modeling Palmprint and Fingerprint based Multimodal Biometric Recognition System,” pp. 1–8, 2016.
J. Dong, X. Meng, and M. Chen, “Template Protection Based on DNA Coding For multimodal biometric recognition,” no. Icsai, pp. 1738–1742, 2017.
R. Devi and A. Prof, “A Study on Biometric and Multi-modal biometric system modules , Applications , Techniques and Challenges,” no. March, pp. 3–4, 2017.
