A review of Recent trends in Supreme Court and Indian Parliament
Keywords:
Legislature, ParliamentAbstract
There are many different types of legal proceedings that fall under the judicial procedure umbrella. The judiciary is one of the pillars that support the structure of the constitution. It is the cornerstone of a democratic society. The term "judicial process" refers to everything a judge does in the course of delivering justice. The evolving social order confronts India's Parliament, which embodies a heritage of actual historical processes and is rooted in and emanates from it. It has not only done its job of expressing people shifting desires, but it has also responded to citizens' collective claims to citizenship in the state. As a result, the Parliament is becoming more democratic as a public institution in the process. Understanding how the institution of Parliament becomes a place where the meaning of citizenship is contested when it faces demands from below is the goal of the study. The study also shows that how to demonstrate how the compulsions of democracy force representative institutions to respond to the needs of people as soon as they stop being passive and start becoming active. Social citizenship is used as a theoretical framework and a citizenship of practice to push the concept that it is being extended from the bottom up in India and is being acted out in the legislative chambers.
References
Banerjee, Abhijit, Rema Hanna, and Senthil Mullainathan (2012). “Corruption”. In: Handbook of Organizational Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Barchan, Pranab (1997). “Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues”. Journal of Economic Literature 35, pp. 1320–1346.
Bertrand, Marianne, Matilde Bombarding, and Francesco Trebbia (2014). “Is It Whom You Know or What You Know? An Empirical Assessment of the Lobbying Process”. American Economic Review 104 (12), pp. 3885–3920.
Bertrand, Marianne, Simeon Janko, et al. (2007). “Obtaining a Driver’s License in India: An Experimental Approach to Studying Corruption”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (4), pp. 1639–1676.
Bubonic, Gustavo J., Luis R. Chamara Fuertes, and Rainer Schwabe (2016). “Monitoring Corruptible Politicians”. American Economic Review 106 (8), pp. 2371–2405.
Boyd, Christina L., Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin (2010). “Untangling the Cao Ejects of Sex on Judging”. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2), pp. 389– 411.
Chen, Daniel L, Tobias J Moskowitz, and Kelly Shue (2016). “Decision Making Under the Gambler’s Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (3), pp. 1181–1242.