Universal design for learning

Authors

  • TARUN NEGI Assistant Professor, Department of Special Education, Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36676/urr.v12.i3.1587

Keywords:

Universal Design for Learning (UDL), Inclusive education, Accessibility in education, Learner diversity

Abstract

According to Universal Design for Learning (UDL), learning and teaching should be easy, open to everyone, and effective for all students. This is done by considering how different and unique each learner is. Science and the idea that there are many ways to interact, reflect, and talk about yourself are what UDL is based on. It says that goals, methods, tools, and tests should be adaptable so that people can get past problems and build on their own skills. By considering the different learning styles, backgrounds, and skills of students, UDL helps teachers plan lessons that get everyone involved, keep students interested, and get better results. For example, it can be used to help make systems that are fair and open to new ideas in general and special education, higher education, and digital learning. UDL is shown to help students from all walks of life, not just those with disabilities. It also helps students who speak more than one language, are smart, or come from different cultural and socioeconomic groups. There is a lot of focus on personalization and including everyone in education systems around the world right now. UDL is a proactive, evidence-based way to rethink how to teach for the 21st century.

References

• CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. CAST. https://udlguidelines.cast.org

• Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2012). Improved lesson planning with Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412446178

• Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize Universal Design for Learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300103

• Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017). Higher education students with disabilities speaking out: Perceived barriers and opportunities of the Universal Design for Learning framework. Disability & Society, 32(10), 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1365695

• Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

• Novak, K., & Thibodeau, T. (2016). UDL in the cloud!: How to design and deliver online education using Universal Design for Learning. CAST Professional Publishing.

• Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A review of research on Universal Design educational models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518980

• Scott, S., McGuire, J. M., & Foley, T. E. (2016). Universal Design for Instruction and learning: Past, present, and future. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(3), 199–214.

• Smith, F. G. (2012). Analyzing a college course that adheres to the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 31–61.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-15
CITATION
DOI: 10.36676/urr.v12.i3.1587
Published: 2025-08-15

How to Cite

TARUN NEGI. (2025). Universal design for learning. Universal Research Reports, 12(3), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.36676/urr.v12.i3.1587

Issue

Section

Original Research Article